Western societies are built on the pillars of freedom, tolerance, and pluralism. These values have given rise to peaceful coexistence among diverse communities from Christians, Jews, atheists, Muslims, Buddha, Hindu and many others. But what if those very values are being used as weapons? What if the doors opened for peaceful religion are being used not for integration, but for ideological conquest? The growing influence of the Muslim Brotherhood and other radical movements across Europe and North America poses this exact threat. While Islam as a religion is followed peacefully by millions, political Islam especially the Muslim Brotherhood has a different objective. It is not a religious movement, but a strategic ideological operation aiming to reshape Western societies, not through violent war, but through a long game of cultural, legal, and psychological infiltration.
The word “jihad” is often misunderstood. Originally, it had both spiritual and military dimensions within Islamic thought. Historically, after the fall of Persia and the rise of Islamic empires, the concept took on a more militant tone as Islam expanded rapidly across North Africa, the Middle East, and parts of Europe. This expansion wasn’t always peaceful. Centuries later, in 1928 Egypt, Hassan al-Banna founded the Muslim Brotherhood not as a spiritual reform movement, but as a political machine. Its aim was the establishment of a global Islamic caliphate, not merely by military force but by social manipulation. Groups like Hesbollah, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Hamas and others in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq have been openly linked to the Brotherhood’s ideology. Backed by nations like Iran, they act as proxies in the region, fighting wars under the banner of Islam while really serving political interests. What we are witnessing is not a resurgence of Islamic devotion but the rebranding of conquest under religious slogans but its actually political and not religious cause.
Yet not all Muslim-majority nations follow this path. In fact, some of the most stable and forward-thinking Muslim countries today stand opposed to the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood. Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Bahrain, Morocco, Egypt, the UAE, and show a model of governance that balances Islamic religion, culture with national stability and economic growth. These nations have actively pursued interfaith harmony. In the UAE, for instance, the Abrahamic Family House now hosts a mosque, a synagogue, and a Christian church side by side, a powerful symbol of real coexistence. Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 is dismantling religious extremism internally while modernizing its economy and society. While they maintain their Islamic identity, these nations reject the use of Islam as a tool for political jihad revolution. They remind the world that being a Muslim country does not automatically mean embracing terrorism or ideological expansionism. It’s not Islam that’s the problem, it’s political Islam.
The true crisis lies in how the West responds to this challenge. Unfortunately, many European, Canadian, and American leaders have become blind to the ideological nature of this infiltration. They confuse peaceful Islam with the strategic mission of political Islam. In many European cities, mosques are being built at an exponential rate, even in regions with only a small percentage of Muslims. These aren’t just houses of worship; in some cases, they serve as centers for ideological formation and community control and jihadist boot camp. In places like London, Birmingham, and parts of Paris, entire neighborhoods function more like Islamic enclaves than integrated parts of a Western city. Welfare systems are strained by populations that do not fully participate in the economy. Muslim women in particular, in some of these areas, remain at home while fully supported by state welfare, often by cultural enforcement like their husband says Muslim women prohibited from work, I mean do we live in 600 A.D these days?. More alarming is the rise of Brotherhood-linked activists and imams who operate legally within the West using NGOs, school systems, and political movements to slowly reshape national narratives around race, identity, and religion. Anti-Western slogans like “Death to America” or “Free Palestine, from the river to the sea” are shouted in public protests, and the West tolerates it in the name of diversity.
If this ideological conquest is not addressed, what will the West look like in 50 years? Europe could see the fall of its historical Christian foundations. Sharia-influenced zones may increase, and legal accommodations for Islamic practices may challenge the rule of secular law. In Canada and America, similar patterns are emerging. Civil discourse could dissolve under the weight of identity-based politics. Freedom of speech will weaken as criticism of political Islam is labeled “Islamophobia,” silencing valid concerns. The Western model of citizenship, based on shared values and laws, will give way to tribalism where loyalty to religious identity trumps national unity.
So what can be done? As individuals, we must first educate ourselves and others. Not all Muslims are the same. Many are peaceful, honest citizens who reject extremism. But political jihadist Islam is a real ideology, and the very virus in human society and we must not be afraid to name it. We must vote for leaders who understand this distinction and will act accordingly. Churches must equip their members to respond not with fear or hate, but with clarity and courage. Governments must crack down on foreign funding of religious institutions that support terrorism and incite it in their sermon, ban extremist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, and uphold Western legal traditions without compromise. NGOs and media must stop promoting radical ideologues as “civil rights activists” when they’re clearly promoting division and conquest.
This is not a call for a new crusade, nor is it a rejection of Islam. It is a call for vigilance for the evil of extremism that does not value human life. For courage. For the defense of Western civilization, its freedoms, and its values. Political Jihadist Islam does not attack with tanks and guns anymore. It attacks with ideas, institutions, and confusion. And if the West does not wake up, it may one day look back and realize it surrendered without ever knowing it was at war.
Reference
Vidino, L. (2020). The Closed Circle: Joining and Leaving the Muslim Brotherhood in the West. Columbia University Press.
Peters, R. (1996). Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam: A Reader. Princeton University Press.
Mitchell, R. P. (1993). The Society of the Muslim Brothers. Oxford University Press.
Vidino, L. (2010). The New Muslim Brotherhood in the West. Columbia University Press.
Brachman, J. M. (2009). Global Jihadism: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
Levitt, M. (2006). Hamas: Politics, Charity, and Terrorism in the Service of Jihad. Yale University Press.
Al-Rasheed, M. (2018). Salman's Legacy: The Dilemmas of a New Era in Saudi Arabia. Oxford University Press.
Ottaway, M. (2017). “The Gulf States and the Muslim Brotherhood.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Adjaye Associates. (2023). The Abrahamic Family House Project Overview. Retrieved from https://www.adjaye.com
Time Staff. (2023, February). “UAE Opens Abrahamic Family House.” Time Magazine. Retrieved from https://time.com
Haykel, B. (2020). “Vision 2030 and the Reform of Islam in Saudi Arabia.” Foreign Affairs.
Arab Center Washington DC. (2021). “The Evolving Relationship Between Religion and Politics in Saudi Arabia.” Retrieved from https://arabcenterdc.org
UK Government. (2015). The Muslim Brotherhood Review: Main Findings. Cabinet Office, United Kingdom.
Vidino, L. (2011). The Muslim Brotherhood in the West: Evolution and Western Policies. Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich.
Del Valle, A. (2005). The Strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe: Gradualism. Center for Security Policy Studies.
Kepel, G. (2002). Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. Harvard University Press.
Emerson, S. (2002). American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Among Us. Free Press.
Burke, J. (2017). The New Threat: The Past, Present, and Future of Islamic Militancy. Grove Press.
Tags
Commentary